On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> wrote: > John Smith, le Wed 20 Jul 2011 01:45:44 +0200, a écrit : >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > John Smith, le Wed 20 Jul 2011 01:28:59 +0200, a écrit : >> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> So how to fix that, without having actual SYSV equivalent 'runlevels >> >> ?Are 'runlevels' even a goal for 'Hurd' ? >> > >> > Not for the Hurd, but for Debian most probably yes, to remain compatible >> > with the existing packages which assume that. >> > >> Wait, what ? >> Debian doesnt have SYSV equivalent 'runlevels' ? > > Sure it has, what in my mail would imply it doesn't? I'm precisely > saying that *Debian* Hurd most probably wants to support runlevels, > since the rest of Debian would assume that there are runlevels. > > Samuel > Ah. Got it. My bad. :(
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadjdz9hnistgim8hsrvm-umu32yysdrzgdwr2m_md7hd7yd...@mail.gmail.com
