On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> wrote: > John Smith, le Wed 20 Jul 2011 01:12:00 +0200, a écrit : >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Svante Signell >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > I think reboot or halt is better, but still fs checks are happening when >> > they shouldn't. >> > >> Hrm. Good point. Dont want no bogus fsck messages. Also, maybe >> 'shutdown' should be aliased to a 'use halt instead message', or just >> alias 'shutdown' to plain 'halt' ? > > Will most probably be rejected by the sysvinit maintainer. Better > simply fix using SYSV on hurd-i386. > > Samuel > Hrm. So how to fix that, without having actual SYSV equivalent 'runlevels ?Are 'runlevels' even a goal for 'Hurd' ? Or is it just a on/off mechanism for Hurd ? If not, whats the alternative, and how does that relate to Unix SYSV init style runlevels ?
- John Smith -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadjdz9gj3dvbwve4ed+dtrmdazaqnua4bcmbbpjc-dsxjnq...@mail.gmail.com
