On 11 June 2011 11:56, beatrice <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2. Similarly, the "recently translated" becomes irrelevant, because we >> can poke it directly into the DB. However, I can imagine people would >> want to keep this. It contains submitted and reviewer information and >> timestamps. Do people have thoughts about what info they'd like to see >> here? Are the logs sufficient? > > Yes, I would like to see this info still. Those of us who pretty much > work a bit each day on the DDTSS have a "mental image" of what is > happening. If suddenly I saw a bunch of translated descriptions that I > never saw in the pending review or that I never reviewed I would go > check if they were spam, for instance.
Ok, that seems useful. Currently the history is kept indefinitely, but I suppose it would be useful to remember to last 20 packages translated. And it's not really important who did what, but more just for keeping an eye on things. > Also when we have different packages in the process of translation which > share a paragraph, we might wait for the consensus on one translation > and when that passes the review all other paragraphs get a uniform > translation. I have thought that for the automatic fetching to exclude descriptions that share an untranslated paragraph with a pending translation. Ofcourse if you manually fetch it's a risk, but I suppose a warning could be displayed. > I surely wouldn't like to see a mandatory approval of all translations by > one "cohordinator/manager" for all languages (one for each of course). I'm trying to make mechanism not policy. I'm currently leaning towards a sort of points system, where the language coordinator can specify points for reviews/translations. So if a translator-review is zero points, then translators can't review a translation. But if you want to treat coordinator/translators/anonymous the same, then that's possible too. > When we don't agree on a translation we usually do a "democratic vote" > either by email or in the comment field..... I don't suppose a "vote" > feature could be added to the interface (?) *g* I guess. Maybe not for the first pass though. > It's not a fundamental issue but anyway. There is a team-message system > in the DDTSS. I have never been able to figure out how/if it works. I > have never had a message for my team show up, I wouldn't know how to > send a message to the whole team. Not sure actually. Like I said earlier, there's an is_admin flag that doesn't appear to be set anywhere... But it appears to be used by some teams, so it must be possible. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[email protected]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
