Heikki Vatiainen wrote: > Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > A6 is marked historic now, I believe. ip6.int is deprecated for 'new > > imlementations'. ip6.arpa is now best current practice, I seem to > > remember (rfc3152). > > Experimental, not historic I think. > > draft-ietf-dnsext-ipv6-addresses-00.txt is trying to make RFCs 2874 > and 2673 experimental. Currently both AAAA[RFC1886] and A6[RFC2874] > are still proposed standards. Is that what you are referring to?
Guess I'm ahead of time :) Apparently it's not in de rfc document series yet. draft-ietf-dnsext-aaaa-a6-01 proposes the move to historic. We'll see what happens. But let's for all sake not redo the A6/AAAA discussion once again... Regarding ip6.arpa vs. ip6.int, rfc3152 is very clear about this. regards, Remco. -- :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://remco.vandemeent.net/
