On 5/18/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Logically, the process used here is more complex than that used by > > gunzip, but effect is similar. > > If nothing else, 17 USC 117 and dynamic linking absolutely protect you > from this theory of infringement in the US. Many jurisdictions are > said to have equivalents. IANAL, etc.
This "absolute protection" did not seem to protect Napster, nor did the home recording act. -- Raul
