On 5/19/05, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:54:20PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > You failed to quote the bit about how what Napster was doing wasn't > > supposed to be illegal. > > That bit would only be relevant if Debian was doing the things that got > Napster in trouble. We aren't.
Or if we're doing similar things. Such as: making available copyrighted works which we do not have the right to distribute. Though, once again: if nobody takes us to court about this we'll not have to face legal liability for it. [But we will be violating the DFSG.] -- Raul
