On 5/19/05, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have made a direct comparison between Debian making it easy for a user > to build an OpenSSL-linked Quagga, and Napster's *flagrant* facilitation of > copyright infringement.
Yes. Note that there was a senator who thought that the laws which had passed should have made Napster immune to prosecution. So your use of "flagrant" in quotes seems appropriate. > You seem to be the only one who thinks that Debian is doing something > illegal. I'm probably the only one (at least among those posting) who is thinking of distribution as a legal issue rather than a technical issue. I will point out, however, that if no one prosecutes us, we don't have to worry about the legality of this issue. -- Raul
