On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:18:19PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On 5/19/05, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That bit would only be relevant if Debian was doing the things that got > > Napster in trouble. We aren't. > > Or if we're doing similar things. > > Such as: making available copyrighted works which we do not have > the right to distribute. > > Though, once again: if nobody takes us to court about this we'll > not have to face legal liability for it. [But we will be violating the > DFSG.]
And once again, you're the only one who thinks we're doing this. The rest of us, as far as I can tell, think that giving a user a script that makes it easier to compile a certain binary does not equate to distribution of the same binary. If it was, then the upstream would be as guilty as we are, since he presumably includes a configre script with --with-ssl as one of its options. --Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
