On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 17:25, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 05:11:07PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > Requiring a binary file rename is also OK; I think we might even do this > > now. > > Is it? Would you consider fileutils free under such a license? > (You can change "ls" all you want as long as you rename the binary)
Sure, why not? I used this very example, and thought that Mark Rafn's rebuttal was persuasive; see http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200207/msg00153.html and the responses for details. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
