Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes: > Frank Mittelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > for that hypothetical license Jeff was talking about I wouldn't > > know, but even that wouldn't be a problem as you could load your new > > makefile with -f. it wouldn't be very useful as the Makefile is a > > building tool, but it wouldn't be an obstacle either. > > I think this response indicates that you really don't understand the > obstacle.
then enlighten me please, as it seems to me just the opposite. I was not suggesting that _any_ license should require renaming Makefile, and I thought that Peter's through-in very nicely showed how badly astray a general requirement for file rename could go. frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
