On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > > First of all, requiring a source file rename is, I think, obviously OK; > > > renaming "foo.c" to "bar.c" doesn't really affect your rights, and is > > > mostly an annoyance (tracking down Makefile references and so on). > > > > Why is this obviously OK? DFSG #4 allows people to mandate the change > > of the name of the work. Requiring name changes of files is too > > granular. > > It's not expressly forbidden or expressly allowed, so we have to figure > out if it's OK or not. As I mentioned, it doesn't seem onerous as a > requirement; just an mv/cp and a few Makefile edits.
Would you not need to rename the Makefile too if you edit it?
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred. | : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
pgp3qD4l16oT0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
