On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 08:39:08PM +0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > What do I think? I think WHY-FREE is a very ironic name for something so > non-free. It should be removed, of course. I'm sorry if RMS will be > unhappy, but the DFSG does not make exceptions if people are unhappy. > Documentation *is* software, and therefore its licenses must follow the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is your idea... documentation is documentation and software is software... then we can discuss about all the documentation licenses, but they are different things.
-- Christian Surchi, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ www.debian.org - www.softwarelibero.it - www.firenze.linux.it | 38374818 Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!