On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 02:23:40PM -0700, Alex Romosan wrote: > WHY-FREE is not documentation! it is a manifesto in which rms expounds > on his views on free software. it's _his_ opinion and as such it > should not be altered. this doesn't make it non-free. > > this thread is getting weirder and weirder...
If I can't change it, it's non-free. There's nothing "weird" about this simple, fundamental concept. (The topic of what non-free things should be allowed in Debian has been under discussion; nobody really disputes that unmodifiable licenses should be, but there's no consensus yet on things like manifestos.) -- Glenn Maynard
