"Brian M. Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do I think? I think WHY-FREE is a very ironic name for > something so non-free. It should be removed, of course. I'm sorry if > RMS will be unhappy, but the DFSG does not make exceptions if people > are unhappy. Documentation *is* software, and therefore its licenses > must follow the DFSG; I thought we just decided that.
sure, and writing a web page in html is "coding". WHY-FREE is not documentation! it is a manifesto in which rms expounds on his views on free software. it's _his_ opinion and as such it should not be altered. this doesn't make it non-free. this thread is getting weirder and weirder... --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |