> ... To the extent that the GFDL caters for the wishes of publishers > at all, it is in that it makes it inconvenient for *competing* > publishers to publish and sell hardcopies. ...
I'm not quite tracking you there. The GFDL isn't supposed to have that effect, at least as I read it, and as I understood RMS's messages. Maybe it does though, but even if so that's not really the point. The FSF wouldn't consider such an effect desirable, so that's not a reason they'd use to decide against going dual GFDL/GPL.
