On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:26:50 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote:

> On Sat, 2006-12-08 at 23:05 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: 
> > Not a good start.  :-(
> Let me take this opportunity to repeat my plea that people who have
> feelings about this issue join the cc-licenses mailing list and post
> messages on the topic.
>         http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses

*Another* mailing list to subscribe to?
Oh, my goodness!  :-(

I don't know if I will manage to find the time necessary to follow that
list and engage in possibly long discussions with CC folks...

In the meanwhile I'm busy in many things, among which the analysis of
the rest of the CC-v3-draft... 

> I've been trying to convey ideas from Debian, but it really helps if
> you can state your ideas in your own voice.

I understand your point: you have already expressed your standpoint
repeatedly with CC folks, but they decided to listen to other parties
and removed the parallel distribution proviso.  At least, I imagine you
have done so...
Now you think that maybe other people talking about the issue could help
more than the n-th reiteration from you, right?

I'll see what I can do.
In any case, consider pointing cc-licenses subscribers to single
debian-legal messages and/or threads that you think express our concerns

Please do not reply to me, as I didn't asked for that; reply to the list
instead, I'm a debian-legal subscriber!  Thanks.

But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend.   -- from _Coming to America_
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpbYoGBhYsCQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to