Francesco Poli wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:57:33 +0200 Arnoud Engelfriet wrote: > > I thought you used Y and Z for cases where Y is licensing Z's > > trademark (if Y is Z's subsidiary or authorized licensee for example). > > Then the trademark holder is Z but Y has certain rights to the mark. > > Err, if I read the original message by Nathanael correctly, [Z] is > intended to be the "meaning" of the trademark.
Why would you do that? That can only be used against you. I also don't see a need to indicate a field for the mark when you license people to do anything with the mark. So maybe you should just omit the entire Z thing. Arnoud -- Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch & European patent attorney - Speaking only for myself Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
