Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The Artistic License 2.0 has been approved by the OSI, but not > explicitly reviewed by debian-legal. Would you like to review it?
Debian considers the freedom of works, not license texts in isolation. > This is currently relevant as the Parrot project is adopting the > orphaned Debian Parrot packages, and is now licensed only under the > Artistic License 2.0. (The previous versions of Parrot packaged for > Debian were dual Artistic 1.0/GPL). Thanks for this. So, this translates to a request to review the legal freedom of the current Parrot package, yes? I presume you're asking for a review of a package (or the latest version of a package) that is not yet in Debian. Where do we find the current copyright statement, grant of license, and the license terms? -- \ "Imagine a world without hypothetical situations." -- Anonymous | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
