On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:49:04AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The Artistic License 2.0 has been approved by the OSI, but not > > explicitly reviewed by debian-legal. Would you like to review it? > Debian considers the freedom of works, not license texts in isolation. Please stop saying this. To the extent that it is true, it's also not relevant. Debian *does* consider the freedom of licenses. The only limitation is that there are licenses that can be either free or non-free based on how they're applied, but that does not preclude examining a license (which is in fact what we do here) and classifying it as, e.g., "free", "free when applied sanely", "free only when this option is used", or "non-free". -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
