Eric Smith <[email protected]> writes: > Ben Finney wrote: > > But it's also plausible that the author of that statement is > > referring to a license *from government* specific to design, > > construction, operation or maintenance of nuclear facilities, and > > nothing to do with copyright: the government does not license the > > recipient for these uses. > > That seems quite implausible to me. The only license that is described > anywhere in the document is the software license that Sun might (or > might not) be granting to a third party.
Right. If some other license is meant by this clause, it is needlessly confusing to mix it in with the terms of the copyright license. So I strongly advise the prospective maintainer to seek from the copyright holder an improved license text which clears up this confusion. -- \ “I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: ‘O | `\ Lord, make my enemies ridiculous!’ And God granted it.” | _o__) —Voltaire | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
