On 2015-01-18 12:16, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Upstream has been contacted. So far they seem to think, that > this is a Debian internal issue and don't want to add anything > to their license (GPL-3+). I'll try again.
Isn't the fact that upstream does not care sufficient evidence that in this case upstream is not opposed to linking against OpenSSL? This fact must be documented in debian/copyright and should be equally valid as the formal exception, right? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150118112351.GA9694@fama
