Alex Mestiashvili <ames...@rsh2.donotuse.de> writes: > Hi, > > could you please clarify if the license below can be considered > DFSG-compatible ? > > Section 2 doesn't sound very good, but section 3 says that GPL-2+ may be > applied. > Will it be fine to simply state that it is licensed under GPL-2+ and > also include the original license in d/copyright ?
It looks a like the LGPL-2. In any event, this license is fine as is. If anyone wants to make modifications that are not allowed by the existing text, then they can modify it under GPL-2+ terms. There are other examples in the archive of this (e.g. CECILL). Cheers, Walter Landry
