On 2026-06-09 22:12, Soren Stoutner wrote:
THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION (TAES) AND THE TEXAS A&M
UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (TAMUS) MAKE NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES
INCLUDING BY WAY OF EXAMPLE, MERCHANTABILITY) WITH RESPECT TO ANY
ITEM, AND SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL
OR CONSEQUENTAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE POSSESSION OR USE OF
ANY SUCH ITEM.
The next part of the text just restates in other words what it means that
there is not warranty of any kind.  Specifically:

LICENSEE AND/OR USER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD
TAES AND TAMUS HARMLESS FROM ANY CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR
POSSESSION OF SUCH ITEMS.
Because these are the same ideas, it doesn’t really matter how many different
ways they say it.

The first one says two things: 1.1) They are not giving you a warranty and 1.2) They are not responsible for damages that happen from using it.

The second one says two things 2.1) "indemnify" and 2.2) "hold harmless". 2.2 might be the same as 1.2. But 2.1 "indemnify" is different: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/indemnify

Here is a random article about "indemnify and hold harmless":
https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2024/01/indemnify-defend-and-hold-harmless-what-does-it-really-mean

Put differently, I read this as 1.1, 1.2, and 2.2 are basically "don't sue me" and 2.1 is "if someone sues me over your use, you have to protect (defend and/or reimburse) me".

--
Richard

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to