Hi Kate,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:11:52PM +0200, Kalou.Katerina wrote:
> Thank you so much for your help! And your patience!! :)
You are welcome.
> Yes, you are absolutely right. It took a while but finally the actual way
> autopkgtest is working has started to 'sink in'
:-)
> > I think to finalise the test it would make sense to compare the test
> > result with the result that was obtained at compile time. Would you
> > mind adding this to confirm that you understood the principle and the
> > changes I did?
>
> I added also the second test needed , please let me know if that is what
> you had in mind!
Second test is fine. What I had in mind was to keep the test results
which are calculated at build time into the data package as well (they
actually ended up there in my previous commits - now I have removed
these). This could be compared with the result of autopkgtest. I have
not implemented this idea but droped a note into README.test and
uploaded as is.
Thanks for your work on this.
> If there is another package that urgently needs an autopkgtest let me
> know, i am open to suggestions
> !
>
> Otherwise i was thinking to have my next try with mac package (bug n.
> 879622)
That's fine. I'm not aware of any urgency. I just filed the bugs to
give people like you an idea what migh be useful next - so feel free to
take it. That would be really welcome.
Thanks again
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
