debian-policy  

Messages by Date

• 2002/05/26 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Clint Adams
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Clint Adams
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Branden Robinson
• 2002/05/25 Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy David Schleef
• 2002/05/25 Bug#148194: debian-policy: Clarification needed regarding multi-line fields John R. Daily
• 2002/05/25 Sie haben ein Kontaktgesuch von Julie69 erhalten byclc wiopJulie69
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Bryan W. Headley
• 2002/05/25 Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/25 Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy Joey Hess
• 2002/05/25 Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy Clint Adams
• 2002/05/25 Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Clint Adams
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Adam Heath
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Branden Robinson
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Michael Banck
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Clint Adams
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Branden Robinson
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Branden Robinson
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Clint Adams
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2002/05/25 Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy Clint Adams
• 2002/05/25 Re: Bug#148172: command -v in postinsts violating policy Joey Hess
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
• 2002/05/25 Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy Branden Robinson
• 2002/05/25 Bug#146703: д���ģ����ɷ���������! ׫��ʵ�ñ���
• 2002/05/23 f�r Dich rrkqb rnqh_Alexandra
• 2002/05/22 nimm mich mejou jjo-Julia-
• 2002/05/22 Processed: reassign 132069 to debian-policy Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/05/21 Removal of /usr/doc/<package> symlinks Bob Hilliard
• 2002/05/21 Bug#147668: marked as done (base-files: please include the OpenSSL license) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/05/21 RE: Bug#147668: base-files: please include the OpenSSL license Tomas Pospisek
• 2002/05/21 Bug#147668: base-files: please include the OpenSSL license Adam Conrad
• 2002/05/21 Re: Bug#147668: base-files: please include the OpenSSL license Tomas Pospisek
• 2002/05/21 Processed: Re: Bug#147668: base-files: please include the OpenSSL license Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/05/21 Re: Bug#147668: base-files: please include the OpenSSL license Santiago Vila
• 2002/05/20 Re: where do NEW packages go? Michael Banck
• 2002/05/20 Re: where do NEW packages go? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/05/20 Re: where do NEW packages go? Michael Stone
• 2002/05/20 Re: where do NEW packages go? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/05/20 Re: where do NEW packages go? Steve Langasek
• 2002/05/20 Re: where do NEW packages go? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/05/20 Re: where do NEW packages go? Steve Langasek
• 2002/05/20 Bug#147554: debian-policy: doc-base refers to inxistent /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy-process.html/index.html Yann Dirson
• 2002/05/19 Re: where do NEW packages go? Adam Heath
• 2002/05/19 Re: where do NEW packages go? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/05/19 Re: where do NEW packages go? Steve Langasek
• 2002/05/18 Re: where do NEW packages go? Adam Heath
• 2002/05/18 Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/05/17 Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files John R. Daily
• 2002/05/17 Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/17 Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files Daniel Burrows
• 2002/05/17 Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files John R. Daily
• 2002/05/17 Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/05/17 Processed: Introduction on ADSL Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/05/16 Re: Bug#147164: www.debian.org: DDP policy is too out of date Osamu Aoki
• 2002/05/15 Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/15 Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files John R. Daily
• 2002/05/15 Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files Richard Braakman
• 2002/05/15 Re: Policy ambiguity regarding control files Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/05/15 beach towel linda
• 2002/05/14 Policy ambiguity regarding control files John R. Daily
• 2002/05/14 Re: Java Policy. Ian Zimmerman
• 2002/05/14 Re: Java Policy. Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/05/14 Re: Java Policy. Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/05/13 Help me Kim chulmin
• 2002/05/13 Mundial 2002 sem_resposta
• 2002/05/13 Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/05/13 Re: Java Policy. Tom Tromey
• 2002/05/13 Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/13 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/13 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/13 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/13 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/13 Re: Free Java specifications (was Re: Java Policy.) Rick Lutowski
• 2002/05/13 Re: Free Java specifications (was Re: Java Policy.) Andrew Pimlott
• 2002/05/12 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/12 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Egon Willighagen
• 2002/05/12 Novidades: Receba uma antena interna para o seu telemovel mailing
• 2002/05/12 Free Java specifications (was Re: Java Policy.) Jim Pick
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Stephen Zander
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Stephen Zander
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Rick Lutowski
• 2002/05/12 Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Adam Heath
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Jim Pick
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Jim Pick
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Adam Heath
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Adam Heath
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Per Bothner
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Jim Pick
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Jim Pick
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Per Bothner
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Andrew Pimlott
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Adam Heath
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Adam Heath
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Adam Heath
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Adam Heath
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Stephen Zander
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Andrew Pimlott
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Stephen Zander
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Tom Tromey
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Andrew Pimlott
• 2002/05/12 Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Oohara Yuuma
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Christopher Browne
• 2002/05/12 Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Oohara Yuuma
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Egon Willighagen
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Andrew Pimlott
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Egon Willighagen
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Andrew Pimlott
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Egon Willighagen
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Egon Willighagen
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Andrew Pimlott
• 2002/05/12 Bug#146756: debian-policy: missing index.html for debian-policy-process Laurence J. Lane
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Jim Pick
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/05/12 Re: Java Policy. Nic Ferrier
• 2002/05/12 Bug#146703: debian-policy needs to be made by the latest debiandoc-sgml Osamu Aoki
• 2002/05/11 Java Policy. Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/05/11 May i have your permission? Robert
• 2002/05/11 Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Josip Rodin
• 2002/05/10 Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/05/10 Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Steve Greenland
• 2002/05/10 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/10 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/10 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/09 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/09 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Steve Greenland
• 2002/05/09 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/09 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/09 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Steve Greenland
• 2002/05/09 Re: The Serious severity Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/09 Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Josip Rodin
• 2002/05/09 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/09 Re: The Serious severity Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/09 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/09 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/09 Re: The Serious severity Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/09 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/09 Re: Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/09 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/09 Re: The Serious severity Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/09 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• 2002/05/09 Re: init.d scripts and LSB David Pashley
• 2002/05/08 Re: The Serious severity Adam Heath
• 2002/05/08 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/08 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/07 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Michael Schultheiss
• 2002/05/07 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/07 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/07 Re: LSB application to systems vs. packages Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/07 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2002/05/07 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/07 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/07 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/07 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/05/07 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2002/05/07 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Chris Lawrence
• 2002/05/06 [no subject] laurent mpeti kabila
• 2002/05/06 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/06 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/05/06 Re: Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/06 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/06 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/06 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Craig Small
• 2002/05/06 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Chris Lawrence
• 2002/05/06 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/06 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/06 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/06 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/06 Re: The Serious severity Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/05/06 Bug#146023: suggested patch against policy, documenting "libexec", or current custom on use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/05/06 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/06 Re: The Serious severity Jeroen Dekkers
• 2002/05/06 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/06 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Jeroen Dekkers
• 2002/05/06 PRIVATE MRS. MARIAM SESE-SEKO
• 2002/05/06 Re: The Serious severity Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/06 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/06 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/05 Novidades sem_resposta
• 2002/05/05 Re: init.d scripts and LSB Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/05 init.d scripts and LSB Craig Small
• 2002/05/04 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/04 hi xxlx nvxrFrank Montana
• 2002/05/04 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" James R. Van Zandt
• 2002/05/04 Re: The Serious severity Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/05/04 Re: The Serious severity Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/04 Re: The Serious severity Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/05/03 Re: The Serious severity Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/03 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
• 2002/05/03 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/03 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Adam Heath

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]