debian-policy  

Messages by Date

• 2001/12/10 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Norbert Veber
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Ian Zimmerman
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? lloyder
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Mark Brown
• 2001/12/10 Bug#122931: debian-policy: Spelling consistency "depend(e|a)ncies" in policy 2.3.8.1 John R. Daily
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? lloyder
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Mark Brown
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Mark Brown
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Adrian Bunk
• 2001/12/10 Re: Bug#122817: base-files: Please provide profile.d hook in /etc/profile Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/10 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/10 Re: Bug#122817: base-files: Please provide profile.d hook in /etc/profile Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
• 2001/12/09 Bug#122931: debian-policy: Spelling consistency "depend(e|a)ncies" in policy 2.3.8.1 Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/09 Bug#122931: debian-policy: Spelling consistency "depend(e|a)ncies" in policy 2.3.8.1 John R. Daily
• 2001/12/09 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Adam Heath
• 2001/12/09 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? John R. Daily
• 2001/12/09 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/09 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? John R. Daily
• 2001/12/09 Processed: Re: Bug#123074: adding gfdl(7) and gpl(7) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/12/09 Re: Bug#123074: adding gfdl(7) and gpl(7) Santiago Vila
• 2001/12/08 Bug#122931: debian-policy: Spelling consistency "depend(e|a)ncies" in policy 2.3.8.1 Ben Armstrong
• 2001/12/08 Bug#122996: debian-policy: dict-client virtual package name proposed Bob Hilliard
• 2001/12/08 Bug#122931: debian-policy: Spelling consistency "depend(e|a)ncies" in policy 2.3.8.1 Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/08 Bug#122931: debian-policy: Spelling consistency "depend(e|a)ncies" in policy 2.3.8.1 Ben Armstrong
• 2001/12/08 Bug#122928: should link to FHS in package Robert Millan
• 2001/12/07 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/07 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Ben Pfaff
• 2001/12/07 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Massimo Dal Zotto
• 2001/12/07 Re: Bug#122817: base-files: Please provide profile.d hook in /etc/profile Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/07 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/07 Re: Bug#122817: base-files: Please provide profile.d hook in /etc/profile Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
• 2001/12/07 Processed: Re: Bug#122817: base-files: Please provide profile.d hook in /etc/profile Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/12/07 Re: Bug#122817: base-files: Please provide profile.d hook in /etc/profile Santiago Vila
• 2001/12/07 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? VALETTE Eric
• 2001/12/07 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Julian Gilbey
• 2001/12/07 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Adam Heath
• 2001/12/07 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Brian May
• 2001/12/06 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/06 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Bdale Garbee
• 2001/12/06 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Joey Hess
• 2001/12/06 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Scott Dier
• 2001/12/06 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Adrian Bunk
• 2001/12/06 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/06 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? VALETTE Eric
• 2001/12/06 Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? Adrian Bunk
• 2001/12/05 Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts? VALETTE Eric
• 2001/12/03 French Translation miss gillian mary berwick brown
• 2001/12/03 Bug#106280: debian-policy: There should be a note on devfs Anthony DeRobertis
• 2001/12/03 Bug#106280: debian-policy: There should be a note on devfs Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/12/03 Re: LSB Status Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/03 Re: LSB Status Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/12/03 Bug#106280: debian-policy: There should be a note on devfs Anthony DeRobertis
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Tran Nam Binh
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/12/02 Re: LSB Status Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/02 Re: LSB Status Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Tran Nam Binh
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Julian Gilbey
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Scott Dier
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/12/02 Re: LSB Status Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/02 Re: LSB Status Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/12/02 Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy Julian Gilbey
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Scott Dier
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Scott Dier
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Scott Dier
• 2001/12/02 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/01 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/01 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/12/01 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/01 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/12/01 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/12/01 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/01 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/01 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Anthony Towns
• 2001/12/01 Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/12/01 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/12/01 Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy Julian Gilbey
• 2001/12/01 Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy Josip Rodin
• 2001/12/01 REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text Branden Robinson
• 2001/12/01 Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy Josip Rodin
• 2001/12/01 Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy Julian Gilbey
• 2001/12/01 Bug#121977: marked as done (bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/12/01 Processed: Re: Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/12/01 Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy Josip Rodin
• 2001/12/01 Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy Josip Rodin
• 2001/12/01 Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy Julian Gilbey
• 2001/12/01 Bug#121977: bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy Josip Rodin
• 2001/12/01 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Daniel Stone
• 2001/11/30 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Anthony Towns
• 2001/11/30 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Daniel Stone
• 2001/11/30 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Hamish Moffatt
• 2001/11/30 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Grant Bowman
• 2001/11/30 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
• 2001/11/30 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Andrew Suffield
• 2001/11/30 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Daniel Stone
• 2001/11/30 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Julian Gilbey
• 2001/11/30 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Daniel Stone
• 2001/11/30 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Hamish Moffatt
• 2001/11/29 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Daniel Stone
• 2001/11/29 Re: [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Joey Hess
• 2001/11/29 [vhost-base] Draft policy proposal Daniel Stone
• 2001/11/28 Re: LSB Status Grant Bowman
• 2001/11/28 wanna see teens models (18 )
• 2001/11/28 Re: LSB Status Anthony Towns
• 2001/11/28 Re: LSB Status Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2001/11/28 Re: LSB Status Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/11/28 Re: LSB Status Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2001/11/28 Re: LSB Status Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/11/28 Re: LSB Status Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2001/11/28 Re: LSB Status Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/11/28 LSB Status Grant Bowman
• 2001/11/27 Bug#120418: Policy proposal: Cpu extension code Camm Maguire
• 2001/11/22 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Florian Weimer
• 2001/11/22 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Florian Weimer
• 2001/11/22 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/11/21 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Matthew Palmer
• 2001/11/21 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Chris Waters
• 2001/11/21 �ؿܿ���� ses���п�����
• 2001/11/21 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Julian Gilbey
• 2001/11/21 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/11/21 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Florian Weimer
• 2001/11/21 httpd-cgi again... Uwe Hermann
• 2001/11/21 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Florian Weimer
• 2001/11/21 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Julian Gilbey
• 2001/11/21 Re: Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/11/21 Non-C/C++/ObjC source files in /usr/include subdirectories Florian Weimer
• 2001/11/21 Processed: Retitle bug Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/11/20 La NewsLetter d'AALWAY Software Tarik Tabani
• 2001/11/20 Bug#120418: cc: Michel LESPINASSE <[email protected]>,Robert Stone <[email protected]>,Eduard Bloch <[email protected]>,Adam C Powell IV <[email protected]>,Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected],camm camm
• 2001/11/20 Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/11/20 Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Brian White
• 2001/11/20 Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/11/20 Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Brian White
• 2001/11/20 Re: Virtual package httpd-cgi. Turbo Fredriksson
• 2001/11/19 Bug#118608: Virtual package radiusd Francesco P. Lovergine
• 2001/11/18 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/18 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/18 Re: Technical Committee / Policy mailing list Martin Schulze
• 2001/11/18 Re: Technical Committee / Policy mailing list Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/11/18 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a separate package Brian Mays
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a separate package Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/11/17 Re: XF86 4.1 on potato Colin Watson
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Ian Jackson
• 2001/11/17 Re: XF86 4.1 on potato Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/17 Re: XF86 4.1 on potato Carl Fink
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/17 Technical Committee / Policy mailing list Ian Jackson
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a separate package Brian Mays
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a separate package Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a separate package Brian Mays
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a separate package Sam Hartman
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a separate package Marcus Brinkmann
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a separate package Taketoshi Sano
• 2001/11/17 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Anthony Towns
• 2001/11/16 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Joey Hess
• 2001/11/16 Processed: your mail Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/11/16 Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Julian Gilbey
• 2001/11/16 Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Francesco Lovergine
• 2001/11/16 Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Julian Gilbey
• 2001/11/16 Processed: New email address Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/11/16 Bug#119821: [PROPOSAL] Postscript files requirements Yann Dirson
• 2001/11/16 Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Francesco Lovergine
• 2001/11/15 Napster of Porn
• 2001/11/14 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/14 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Ian Jackson
• 2001/11/14 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/14 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a separate package Brian Mays
• 2001/11/14 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a s eparate package Peter S Galbraith
• 2001/11/14 Re: [[email protected]: radiusd-freeradius: This package is not Debian native] Josip Rodin
• 2001/11/14 Re: Bug#119517: pcmcia-cs: cardinfo binary needs to move into a separate package Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/14 Re: [[email protected]: radiusd-freeradius: This package is not Debian native] Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/14 Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Francesco Lovergine
• 2001/11/13 Re: [[email protected]: radiusd-freeradius: This package is not Debian native] Adam Heath
• 2001/11/13 Re: Bug#119143: debian-policy: it would be nice to have policy as texinfo Ardo_Vanrangelrooij
• 2001/11/13 Re: Bug#119143: debian-policy: it would be nice to have policy as texinfo Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/11/13 Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Sam Hartman
• 2001/11/13 Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Francesco Lovergine
• 2001/11/13 Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Sam Hartman
• 2001/11/13 Re: Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Francesco Lovergine
• 2001/11/12 Re: [[email protected]: radiusd-freeradius: This package is not Debian native] Julian Gilbey
• 2001/11/12 Re: [[email protected]: radiusd-freeradius: This package is not Debian native] Branden Robinson
• 2001/11/12 Re: [[email protected]: radiusd-freeradius: This package is not Debian native] Sam Hartman
• 2001/11/11 [[email protected]: radiusd-freeradius: This package is not Debian native] Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
• 2001/11/11 debian-policy님 안녕하십니까? 이현우
• 2001/11/11 Bug#119143: debian-policy: it would be nice to have policy as texinfo David N. Welton
• 2001/11/09 Great Stocking Stuffer Ideas from Lego Software HotDeals
• 2001/11/09 Bug#118608: PROPOSAL] New virtual package radius-server Sam Hartman

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]