Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 10 Oct 1998, Adam P. Harris wrote: > > 2. info browsers, manual pagers, terminfo libraries, etc., are > > Yes, but where is the info program that looks in both directories? > Before saying "this must be done in this way" I would like to be sure that > effectively it may be done and someone will do it.
What possible assurance could I give you? I think, say, filiing important bugs on the relevant packages would suffice to ensure that the issue is fixed prior to the release. Clearly I'm not proposing to do this now -- no, only once we've resolved to transition (gently) to FHS. > > The only sticky point, really, is /usr/doc. Moving that to > > /usr/share/doc is going to be difficult. Maybe we could just avoid > > that....? > Installing new FHS-compliant packages that replace the old ones > should be enough. Um. Have you seen the dwww and dhelp packages? /usr/doc is used for web-enable documentation browsing. Having both /usr/doc and /usr/share/doc will be problematic. .....A. P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
