Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 16 Oct 1998, Adam P. Harris wrote: > > I think, say, filiing important bugs on the relevant packages would > > suffice to ensure that the issue is fixed prior to the release. > > Clearly I'm not proposing to do this now -- no, only once we've > > resolved to transition (gently) to FHS.
> Ok, could we then upgrade those bugs to "normal" at least? > > They are not just "things that would be nice to have implemented" > (wishlist). We really *need* to have them fixed in the near future. > Otherwise we will never move to FHS. Woah there, one step at a time. I'd like to see (a) a proposed appendix to the Packaging Manual about handing the FSSTD->FHS issue, or else a separate file in the packaging-manual package; and finally (b) general consensus, i.e., "this is the best way to do it" on (a); and finally, (c) a proposed policy amendment. Only once all that is done, can we start filing serious bugs. Just MHO. .....A. P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
