On 03/13/2018 12:29 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Imo, we should just make it clear in policy that source packages > should be named `foo` or `python-foo`, > and corresponding doc packages should be named `foo-doc` or `python-foo-doc`.
Very often, "foo" is already taken by another package, and we have to fallback to python-foo. Think about generic libs for compression, images, network standards... Which is why I think we should have standardize on python-foo for the source package (which is what I do). Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
