Le mardi 13 mars 2018 à 09:18 +0100, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> On 03/13/2018 12:29 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > Imo, we should just make it clear in policy that source packages
> > should be named `foo` or `python-foo`,
> > and corresponding doc packages should be named `foo-doc` or
> > `python-foo-doc`.
> Very often, "foo" is already taken by another package, and we have to
> fallback to python-foo. Think about generic libs for compression,
> images, network standards...


> Which is why I think we should have standardize on python-foo for the
> source package (which is what I do).

Same here.

Do you think we should be recommending the use of `python-foo` in the
DPMT packaging policy? This could help avoiding ITPs for `python3-bar`.


Reply via email to