Hello Everybody, I left some advances on poetry. Happily (from my point of view) we are near to having poetry packaged. I've just push some new commits to salsa .
After spend several times with the tests (see patches), we just have two test that still fail (I didn't looking it yet): tests/installation/test_pip_installer.py - fail one unit test tests/utils/test_env.py - fail several unit tests. To build poetry, you will also need to build locally python3-cleo still in NEW , python-httpretty 1.0.5: I prepare a new upstream release and a member of OpenStack sponsored its to experimental (thanks Michal Arbet)  and pkginfo 1.7.0, I ping @jandd on #debian-python for a new upstream release packaging, but if I haven't got news about it these days, I will push my work and I'll ask for sponsorship.  https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958366  https://tracker.debian.org/news/1241115/accepted-python-httpretty-105-01-source-into-experimental/ Cheers, Emmanuel On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 8:55 AM Emmanuel Arias <eam...@yaerobi.com> wrote: > Hello! > > On 5/11/21 1:25 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 9:56 PM Emmanuel Arias <eam...@yaerobi.com> > wrote: > >> On 5/8/21 10:37 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Emmanuel Arias <eam...@yaerobi.com> > wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > >>>>>> * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/ > >>>>> are you handling this failure? > >>> looks like this is fixed in git: do you need a sponsor? > >> Yes, please. Thanks! > > sounds good, i'll have a look at this package soon and let you know > Thanks! > > > >>>>>> * python-cleo in review > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo I hope finished this > week > >>> stefanor uploaded it a few days ago > >> Yes. > >>>>>> * poetry still in progress > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry -> need help and > reviews > >>> for this one it looks like you imported a new upstream release a week > >>> ago: is there something we can help/check about poetry? > >> I've just push some advances. Currently, I'm working on tests, if you > >> want to take a look. > > maybe just ask here (or directly to me) if you have questions and > > what's failing/needs work, so we dont duplicate work > ok! > > > >> We need new upstream release for python-httpretty (for tests), that I > >> upload to mentors . @zigo ask me about test that this new upstream > >> release doesn't break > >> cloud-init and python3-scciclient (I would like to take a look to ratt > >> for that). > > ratt is pretty great, and rather simple to use: > > > > - setup a sbuild schroot for unstable > > - build a binary package from the source you're working on > > - `ratt <file>_amd64.changes` > > > > and then you'll get on screen the results for each package + a > > directory with the build results and logs > > > > https://github.com/Debian/ratt > > > > keep in mind it rebuilds packages sequentially, so it can take some > > time if the number of reverse deps is high. > > Thanks for the advice! > > > > >> Perhaps a good help from a more experienced person would be check if all > >> is ok with DFSG,that's my biggest concern. > > for which package specifically? while it's boring and long work, it's > > also rather trivial: look at every single file (yep, all of them) from > > the upstream source, and document their copyright and license in > > d/copyright -- happy to answer questions if you have something > > specific in mind about this > > Thanks, I hope have more news at the finish of the week > > Cheers! > > > > > > Regards, >