On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:52:41PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Goswin wrote: > > Need-build is a good sign. http://buildd.net/ shows you are on place > > 37 out of 120. I suggest just waiting unless the buildd has stoped > > altogether. > > What is the ordering criteria on the buildds?
According to the documentation: The packages are ordered by the following criteria (in this order): - out-of-date/uncompiled (the former come first) - priority (e.g. "required" before "optional") - section (alphabetically) - package name (alphabetically) Note the the priority has nothing do with with the urgency of the upload, it has no effect on it. The documentation seems to be a litte out of date, and before those 4, there is also a rule that lists all packages of higher priority than standard before the rest. Basicly, when there are no new/uncompiled packages involved, the order is by priority, then section, then alphabetically. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
