On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:48 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 21:30 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I noticed that you've recently uploaded new upstream versions of sqlite3 > > and neon27 to unstable. Were either of these uploads targetted at > > Squeeze? > Yes, both. The easiest is neon27, which is a clean upload of the > previous one which contained the fixes as backported patches.
Thanks for the quick response. It doesn't *just* contain the fixes which were previously backported though, there are code changes included which were not present in 0.29.3-3. From a quick look, I'm not immediately convinced that those code changes are RC; the moving of the patches in to the upstream code certainly isn't. The bigger issue is that because neon27 calls dh_makeshlibs with -V, the shlibs are bumped with every upload even if it's not necessary. Checking the diff between 0.29.3-3 and 0.29.5-1, none of the changes look like they warrant a shlib bump. For a leaf package this isn't an issue, but for a library it can be and in this case is about to become one - subversion needs to be updated in unstable but will then be unable to migrate as it will depend on a neon27 package newer than the version in testing. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on where we go from here. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
