Hi Adam, On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 19:21 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:48 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: [ about neon27 packages ] > It doesn't *just* contain the fixes which were previously backported > though, there are code changes included which were not present in > 0.29.3-3. From a quick look, I'm not immediately convinced that those > code changes are RC; the moving of the patches in to the upstream code > certainly isn't. There are changes for win32 and Solaris; the changelog says: Fix possible Solaris linker errors if building static library Win32: Fix Kerberos authentication support with SSPI (Danil Shopyrin) Further fix for SSPI support on Win32 (Danil Shopyrin)
Also fixes the following: Fix error handling when pulling a request body from an file (thanks to Lou Montulli) Fix ne_request_dispatch() return value for SOCKS proxy failure cases Tighten SSL cert ID checks to deny a wildcard match against an IP address The latter can be important, but I agree that other OSes fixes are not. > The bigger issue is that because neon27 calls dh_makeshlibs with -V, the > shlibs are bumped with every upload even if it's not necessary. Will remove that switch. > Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on where we go from here. We've two routes. For the first and very last time, you let neon27 to go into Squeeze and I won't upload anything during freeze without asking and confirmation now and ever. Second, I upload a new neon27 package, with patches that back out all unrelated changes. In short, I make a v0.29.3 + previously backported changes from the v0.29.5 tree. If I should go this route, may I name it 0.29.5-1really0.29.3 ? BTW, I'm subscribed to the list and no need to Cc. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
