On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 21:48 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:31 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 20:10 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > how about > > > something like: > > You mean leave 0.29.5 in the archive as is, but with shlibs as 0.29.3 ? > > Like I prepared the package[1] and as debdiff[2] shows? > > Sorry if I've introduced any confusion here. To be honest, my thought > was more toward re-introducing 0.29.3, hence the mention of a > 0.29.5really0.29.3 "upstream" source version.
Or I might just have confused myself instead *sigh* If you were suggesting uploading 0.29.5-2 with the shlibs change to use 0.29.3 and then leaving it in unstable and 0.29.3 in squeeze then yes, that would be fine. Regards, Adam (who promises to stop replying to himself, at least for tonight) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
