On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:46:42PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 21:13 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:58 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Or I might just have confused myself instead *sigh* If you were > > > suggesting uploading 0.29.5-2 with the shlibs change to use 0.29.3 and > > > then leaving it in unstable and 0.29.3 in squeeze then yes, that would > > > be fine. > > Please give a quick look at the package[1] or review the debdiff[2]. > > I did the latter; it looks good, thanks. Please go ahead with the > upload.
... and the upload is broken. $ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libneon27-gnutls.shlibs libneon-gnutls 27 libneon27-gnutls \ (>= 0.29.3-3) Breaks dpkg-shlibdeps, which thinks it should add a dependency "libneon27-gnutls \". Bug on it's way. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [email protected] | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
