> Yes, but when you're upgrading your existing packages, and the
> dependencies have changed to such a degree to require *new* packages,
> that almost always implies a major change, such as a stable -> testing
> transition, not a security fix for a package in stable (which is what
> security.debian.org is for).
Yes, that makes sense. I guess my point is that from the manpage paragraph,
this wasn't immediately clear, so I wouldn't be surprised if there are other
people who misinterpreted it the same way I did.
Thanks for the clarification.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Personal Homepage: http://www.skyjammer.com/~pronovic/
"I have zero tolerance for zero-tolerance policies."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
