On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le March 10, 2008 03:15:04 pm Jim Popovitch, vous avez écrit : > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Le March 10, 2008 02:57:56 pm Jim Popovitch, vous avez écrit : > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > This statement is in a security announcement. Martin Schulze > > > > > confirmed that he wrote the statement. Does the security team think > > > > > that oldstable security support duration is something to be proud > > > > > of? > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > If you don't mind, how did you get the opinion of the security team on > > > this? > > > > I read their text. > Which one?
Their public one, the one you referenced. Why do you perceive that they shouldn't be proud? Where is your basis that they don't deserve to be proud? -Jim P.
