Le March 10, 2008 04:23:07 pm Jim Popovitch, vous avez écrit : > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le March 10, 2008 03:15:04 pm Jim Popovitch, vous avez écrit : > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Le March 10, 2008 02:57:56 pm Jim Popovitch, vous avez écrit : > > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Filipus Klutiero > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > This statement is in a security announcement. Martin Schulze > > > > > > confirmed that he wrote the statement. Does the security team > > > > > > think that oldstable security support duration is something to > > > > > > be proud of? > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > If you don't mind, how did you get the opinion of the security team > > > > on this? > > > > > > I read their text. > > > > Which one? > > Their public one, the one you referenced. Argh. If I'm asking about a statement, that's because I read it. Obviously, the author didn't bother checking whether he was right, which is why I'm asking whether there are some people that disagree.
> Why do you perceive that > they shouldn't be proud? Where is your basis that they don't deserve > to be proud? I already explained this in the bug report.