Mark Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thursday, January 16, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > > Hi, > > > > When Adam and I talked about this we both came to the conclusion that > > until the various policies (FHS, LSB) support using /usr/share/xml we > > should be using /usr/share/sgml. > > Makes sense, for now anyway. > > Maybe we should start a push for FHS to add /usr/share/xml. It's gonna > be needed eventually, and I'd rather do all of this once:)
True, but I would prefer to have the XML catalog stuff in place now and don't wait for policy to catch-up. Moving it to /usr/share/xml later should not be a big issue if the catalogs are ok. > Does anyone on this list know if the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard > Group has even considered/discussed this addition to the FHS? Someone started the discussion, but it died after two of three messages with no real discussion whatsoever. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
