Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to retract my above remark. Here's why: > > The fact that the (non-normative) XML catalog DTD[1] allows the > "xmlbase:" attribute already puts it _outside_ the realm of > SGML. And this is only one of the many up-and-coming issues we'll > face while developing a standards-based XML/SGML Policy for debian. > > My point being that the XML Catalog DTD itself has components that > place it outside the SGML standard, and so we need to find a > standards-based means of implementing /usr/share/xml... > > IMO, therefore, we need to work with FHS to add /usr/share/xml to the > FHS. And asap.
Well, I doubt we can make the FHS jump. If we wanna start using /usr/share/xml even before the FHS blesses it, I think we should go ahead and do that. I'm kinda of the opinion that we *should* make that move, it seems to match what the rest of the world is doing. Any reason why we shouldn't? -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
