On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:55:52 -0600 John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm sure the anit-monopoly guys will have something to say about this. > > A patent is a legal monopoly enforced by the courts. The issue raised on /., that purveror of all great knowledge and wisdom, was that a monopolistic company enforcing a patent that requires using their monopoly product would be a problem. That is by enforcing their patents on FAT, and because of the pervasiveness of m$ products, more people would be forced to use m$ products. This would be using their monopoly to increase their monopoly and might cause action. IANAL. FWIW. YMMV. etc. A > -- > John Hasler > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
