David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-0000), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi.
>> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi, you have one radio splitting
>> its time between pretending to be an AP for a client device, and
>> pretending to be a client device to the upstream AP.
> Then I'm not sure why you wrote "Good deal". I'd be wanting the
> wireless connectivity described above as not needed, though obviously
> on a separate band/channel. Were you implying that that would kill
> throughput for everything too?

If he's using the buffalo device to "repeat" the wifi signal (which he
isn't), then yes the throughput would tank.

|_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5  4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281

Reply via email to