David Wright wrote: > On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 16:26:47 (-0000), Dan Purgert wrote: >> >> It's a nuance in the semantics of what it means to "repeat" wifi. >> Suffice to say, in order to "repeat" wifi, you have one radio splitting >> its time between pretending to be an AP for a client device, and >> pretending to be a client device to the upstream AP. > > Then I'm not sure why you wrote "Good deal". I'd be wanting the > wireless connectivity described above as not needed, though obviously > on a separate band/channel. Were you implying that that would kill > throughput for everything too?
If he's using the buffalo device to "repeat" the wifi signal (which he isn't), then yes the throughput would tank. -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281