On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:29:04AM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:

> Google could evaluate the non-browser software in use and pass what is
> secure and fail the other packages with explanations for the authors of
> failed packages [...]

I think it's more subtle than that. "Traditional" (i.e. non-Webmail)
clients are qualified as "insecure" although they haven't to be.

This will softly nudge people towards (Google) webmail.

OTOH I don't want to be misunderstood. Google is big, and they actually
do a couple of things which benefit us all. Project Zero, for one.
Google Summer of Code, for another.

-- tomás

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to