>"breaking" Condorcet isn't a meaningful thing to say. Adding quorum and I think we all understand it to mean "causing the system to violate the Condorcet criterion".
>supermajority obviously produce different outcomes to Cloneproof SSD -- >if they didn't, there'd be no point adding them. They don't necessarily >choose the Condorcet winner either, but that's a feature, not a bug. So, supposing there is a Condorcet winner (who doesn't make quorum), and another non-default option (who does), you want to choose the *other* option, not the default option *or* the Condorcet option? That's perverse, and certainly an extremely undesirable quality of a voting system. --Nathanael
