-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:27:59 +0100 Robert Millan wrote:
> I think you're trying to imply that somehow SC #1 > and SC #4 are not consistent. That is, that "our priorities are our users" > is incompatible with our system being "100% free". They are incompatible. As noted in the thread on debian-devel [1], even debian's own servers won't run debian any more, because they require non-debian firmware. Debian won't run on a large fraction of hardware any more. (If a binary blob turns a debian kernel into a non-debian kernel, then that same blob turns a computer running the debian OS into a computer not running debian). To restate the obvious: After the transition a lot of current debian users won't be using debian anymore. (In all likelihood including most DDs.) Cheers, Johannes [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/11/msg00140.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkYNd4ACgkQC1NzPRl9qEUUhQCfdsDScj1z1GodJvtVjNGF40pt V4kAn3bJ65E8OeXm75Z+5SlGMq34SU9P =A3pK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
