On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 01:24:56PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:48:44AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > >> No it's really not funny. I'm sick of reading ad nauseam your opinion. > > > > Then don't read it. Me, I'm sick of reading personal attacks, but I > > choose to read anyway out of responsibility. > > If you're sick of personal attacks, stop this bullshit and spend your > time on something useful.
This seems to suggest that personal attacks are well deserved because I didn't spend my time the way _you_ find useful. On one hand, I spend my time the way I find useful myself, and I will continue to do so. Sorry if that bothers you. On the other, personally attacking someone because of the way he's chosen to deal with his free time reflects a rather weak standpoint, and lack of real arguments. > To start the same bullshit again for the next release, a few days before > the release? No, it started years before the release. I only stepped in when it became clear that the bugs were being ignored. Stop pretending there was no time to react. - #494010 was known since 2006. - #493925, #494007, #494308 were known since 2004. The first response in #494308 is a jewel: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494308#10 <quote> I already waited for this. You don't expect us to remove the e100 driver, do you? </quote> They're so few words, but they tell so many things. It's the perfect summary. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
