On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:46:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > This is exactly why I'm going to be voting for one of the options that > modifies the foundation documents and establishes a permanent and > unambiguous decision. I think this has gone on far, far too long and > wastes way too much time and energy, and it's clear that it's never going > to be considered resolved short of a modification of the foundation > documents, given that hardware requirements for firmware are not going to > magically disappear.
They probably won't, but there are no hardware requirements that prevent firmware source code from being distributed under a free license. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
