Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> writes: > I am sure that many of us care more about Debian, than about their > personal absolute freedom to use AI the way they want, or about their > personal absolute freedom to never ever be exposed to AI outputs. So > maybe there's a way to build better ballot options that seek more > consensual ways of working together while accomodating some/most of the > needs of both camps.
Yay! Voting on complex topics tends to get in the way of consensual incremental efforts to understand and resolve things. Compare Guix's position on LLM [1] that will have to be reworked when one person disagreed and ~50 agreed [2] with the proposal. One could see that as deeply problematic from a democratic point of view. Or dedeply inspirational from a consensual viewpoint. Both is correct. /Simon (potentially my only contribution to this topic) [1] https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/src/commit/a24520c4147ffd67bb696c71f15ed4fb8521a791/008-genai.md [2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-07/msg00268.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
