On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 05:09:28PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
On 8/15/26 15:09, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I am well aware that this is controversial. I received both very
positive and very negative feedback, and also requests to update the
table.
It is, most of all, pointless.
Voters are still required to read all the proposals, just as people
using LLMs for programming are still required to read and understand
all of the code they submit.
Please speak for yourself. This is a classical case of AI contribution
being useful. It allows me to first make myself a rough picture of
things and determining the order in which I will re-read the proposals.
This is a major help for me. In my Opinion. And I thank Lucas for doing
this work.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
